Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Criteria of Quality Assessment (a Modified McHarm checklist).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Flow Diagram of Screened and Included Papers.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 2.

Study Characteristics (SMOKING).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Study Characteristics (RADIOTHERAPY).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Study Characteristics (DIABETES).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Study Characteristics (OSTEOPOROSIS).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Figure 2.

Forest plot of studies with dental implant failure risk for smoking versus non-smoking patients.

The combined Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 6.

Subgroup analysis to investigate differences between studies included in meta-analysis.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Figure 3.

Forest plot of studies with dental implant failure risk for patients with radiotherapy versus non-smoking.

The combined Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Forest plot of studies with dental implant failure risk for patients with diabetes versus non-diabetes.

The combined Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Forest plot of studies with dental implant failure risk for patients with osteoporosis versus non-osteoporosis.

The combined Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.

More »

Figure 5 Expand