Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Flow diagram of patient selection and inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Note– *DSC: dynamic susceptibility contrast, IHC:immunohistochemistry.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Clustering method was used as a semi-automatic segmentation of glioblastoma.

(A) Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images were used as structural images. (B) Volume of interest (VOI) was determined by a neuroradiologist. (C, D) VOIs were divided into seven tissue classes according to pixel values and class 6 and 7 were selected as enhancing tumor tissue. (C: class 6, D: class 6 and 7 together).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Box and whisker diagram displaying the relationship between normalized relative tumor blood volume (nTBV) and PTEN expression status in EGFR expression-positive group.

The EGFR expression-positive glioblastomas with PTEN loss showed statistically higher nTBV values than those without PTEN loss. Note– nTBV: normalized relative tumor blood volume.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 1.

nTBV values according to genetic alterations.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Az values, sensitivities, and specificities of nTBV in predicting PTEN loss or MGMT methylation status of GBM.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 4.

Box and whisker diagram displaying the relationship between normalized relative tumor blood volume (nTBV) and MGMT promoter methylation status.

The MGMT methylation-positive group showed statistically lower nTBV values than the MGMT methylation-negative group. Note– *MEth: MGMT promoter methylation, nTBV: normalized relative tumor blood volume.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Scatter diagram and regression line display the relationship between nTBV and Ki-67 labeling index.

There was strong positive correlation between the Ki-67 labeling index and nTBV. Note– *nTBV: normalized relative tumor blood volume.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Scatter diagram and regression line display the relationship between nTBV and p53 index.

There was no significant correlation between p53 index and nTBV value. Note– *nTBV: normalized relative tumor blood volume.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Figure 7.

Glioblastomas with aggressive genetic profiles show high normalized relative tumor blood volume (nTBV).

(A, B) A 66-year-old woman had glioblastoma with EGFR expression (3+), PTEN loss (+), MGMT methylation (−), and a Ki-67 index of 39%. The tumor showed high nTBV (27.5).(C, D) A 70-year-old man had glioblastoma with EGFR expression (3+), PTEN loss (+), MGMT methylation (−), and a Ki-67 index of 27%. The tumor showed high nTBV (12.84). (A, C) Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted axial image, (B, D) normalized relative cerebral blood volume (nCBV) map overlaid on structural contrast-enhanced T1-weighted axial image.

More »

Figure 7 Expand

Figure 8.

Glioblastomas with favorable genetic profiles show low normalized relative tumor blood volume (nTBV).

(A, B) A 67-year-old man had glioblastoma with EGFR expression (2+), PTEN loss (−), MGMT methylation (+), and a Ki-67 index of 5%. The tumor showed low nTBV (4.3). (C, D) A 36-year-old woman had glioblastoma with EGFR expression (+), PTEN loss (−), MGMT methylation (+), and a Ki-67 index of 9%. The tumor showed low nTBV (4.59) (A, C) Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted axial image, (B, D) normalized relative cerebral blood volume (nCBV) map overlaid on structural contrast-enhanced T1-weighted axial image.

More »

Figure 8 Expand