Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) version 21.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Exclusions from dataset on study wards during DNACPR and UFTO periods.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 2.

The United Kingdom Version of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Global Trigger Tool (GTT).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of characteristics of patients in whom a decision not to resuscitate was made in both groups.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 3.

‘Word Clouds’ generated from summary text on forms of all patients not for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

3a. Text taken from Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation orders. 3b. Text taken from Universal Form of Treatment Options.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 3.

Non-GTT variables measured.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Global Trigger Tool Analysis on those patients in whom a decision not to attempt resuscitation was made (DNACPR group n = 103; UFTO group n = 118).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Rating of Severity of Harms using the NCC MERP Index in DNACPR and UFTO groups.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

The frequency of each type of harm for trigger categories within UFTO and DNACPR groups.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Balancing measures of GTT in those patients for resuscitation (n = 60 in period A, n = 58 in period B) and on patients in whom a decision not to resuscitate was made on non–study wards in the same periods (n = 25 in period A, n = 25 in period B).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Key comparative themes emerging from interview accounts.

More »

Table 8 Expand