Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Oligonucleotides for cloning miR-130a, shRNA and 3′UTRs of target genes.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Characterization of EPCs by confocal microscopy and flow cytometric analysis.

(A) Staining of FITC-UEA-1 (a), DiI-Ac-LDL (b), and dual staining of FITC-UEA-1 and DiI-Ac-LDL (c) were detected using a confocal microscope. (B) A representative FSC/SSC plot. (C) Flow cytometric analysis of the cell surface markers of EPCs (CD34, KDR, CD133, CD14 and CD45). The presented experiment is a typical result obtained from three separate experiments.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

MiR-130a suppressed Runx3 expression.

(A–C) Cells were transfected with a miR-130a inhibitor (anti-miR-130a) or a negative control (blank). (A) Runx3 mRNA level measured by real-time PCR (normalized to β-actin), (B–C) Protein expression of Runx3 by Western blotting and respective densitometric measurement results of Runx3, (D) Luciferase reporter assay. The partially complementary miR-130a-binding site found in the Runx3 3′-UTR (or a mutated binding site) was inserted downstream of a luciferase reporter on the psiCHECK™-2 Vector report plasmid and transfected into EPCs with miR-130a mimic or miR-130a inhibitor. *P<0.05 vs. respective scrambled control (blank) groups. #P<0.05 vs. healthy control group. Similar results were obtained in at least three separate experiments and error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

MiR-130a inhibition decreased EPC proliferation, migration and colony formation, but increased EPC apoptosis.

Cells were transfected with a miR-130a inhibitor (anti-miR-130a) or a negative control (blank) (A) Gene expression of miR-130 by real-time PCR (normalized to U6). (B to F) Functional assays of EPCs: proliferation (B), migration (C), colony formation (D), and apoptosis (E, F) of EPCs. *P<0.05 vs. respective scrambled control (blank) groups. #P<0.05 vs. healthy control group. CFU: colony-forming units. Similar results were obtained in at least three separate experiments and error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

The effect of miR-130 and Runx3 on EPC differentiation.

Expression of CD64 and vWF were analyzed by flow cytometry. (A, B) Cells were transfected with a miR-130 inhibitor or both miR-130 inhibitor and lentiviral Runx3. (C, D) cells were transfected with lentiviral miR-130 or both lentiviral miR-130 and lentiviral vector expressing Runx3 shRNA (Runx3-SH). Lenti-V: cells were tranfected with an empty vector. *P<0.05 vs. respective Lenti-V groups. #P<0.05 vs. healthy control group. Similar results were obtained in at least three separate experiments and error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Runx3 repression promoted EPC function.

(A–D) Cells were transfected with a lentiviral vector expressing Runx3 shRNA to downregulate Runx3 expression (Runx3-SH) or an empty vector (Lenti-V). (A) Runx3 protein levels by Western blotting and densitometric measurement results of Runx3 protein. (B) EPC proliferation assay. (C) EPC colony formation assay (D) Migration assay. (E) Cells were transfected with a lentiviral vector expressing miR-130a or both miR-130a and Runx3. Tubule formation assay was performed. *P<0.05 vs. respective Lenti-V groups. #P<0.05 vs. healthy control groups for A–D. Similar results were obtained in at least three separate experiments and error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Runx3 mediated miR-130a’s effect on EPC function and miR-130a upregulated VEGF, p-ERK and Akt1.

(A–E) Cells were transfected with both lentiviral miR-130a and lentiviral Runx3 or lentiviral miR-130a alone. (A) mRNA expression of Runx3 by real-time PCR (normalized to β-actin). (B, C) Protein expression of Runx3 by Western blotting. (D, E) Colony formation and migration capacity of EPCs. * P<0.05 vs. respective empty vector groups (Lenti-V). # P<0.05 vs. lenti-130a group. ** P<0.05 between the same processed healthy and diabetic groups (eg. Lenti-130a control groups VS Lenti-130a diabetes groups ) (F, G) EPCs were transfected with a miR-130a inhibitor or a negative control (Blank), or lentiviral miR-130 or an empty vector (Lenti-V). Protein levels of VEGF, p-ERK and Akt1 were measured by Western blotting. *P<0.05 Lenti-130a vs. Lenti-V group or anti-130a vs. scrambled control (blank) group. VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; ERK: extracellular signal-regulated kinase; PI3K: phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase. The presented experiment is a typical result obtained from three separate experiments.

More »

Figure 6 Expand