Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of observed variables.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 1.

Descriptive data of study participants (n = 369).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of measured variables in the current study: exogenous and endogenous variables.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Original model of TPB protective sexual behaviors.

Model fit indices: χ2/df = 33.47, GFI = 0.72, CFI = 0.66, RMSEA = 0.30, broken line = non-significant path. **p<0.01.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

The model of TPB intention for premarital sexual abstinence.

Model fit indices: χ2/df = 2.257, GFI = 0.988, AGFI = 0.958, CFI = 0.996, NFI = 0.993, RMSEA = 0.058. Abbreviations: PSA = premarital sexual attitude scale, ASE = abstinence self efficacy, IPS = intention for premarital sexual abstinence. *p<0.05, **p<0.01.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

The model of TPB intention for condom use.

Model fit indices: χ2/df = 3.034, GFI = 0.970, AGFI = 0.933, CFI = 0.970, NFI = 0.956, RMSEA = 0.074. Abbreviations: CAS = condom attitude scale, IPC = intention for premarital condom use, consist = consistency in condom use, correct = correct use of condoms, commu = communication on condom use. **p<0.01.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 3.

Path coefficient for final model of planned behaviors.

More »

Table 3 Expand