Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

HPLC purification of mHWTX-IV.

The peaks marked by * contain mHWTX-IV. (A) Elution profile of Ornithoctonus huwena Wang venom by ion-exchange HPLC. (B) Isolation of mHWTX-IV by RP-HPLC on a C18 column in a gradient of 10–50% acetonitrile over 50 min. (C) Further purification of mHWTX-IV by a repetitive RP-HPLC with a gradient of 28–40% acetonitrile over 30 min.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Mass spectrometry of mHWTX-IV and HWTX-IV.

(A) Molecular mass of mHWTX-IV detected by mass spectrometry, 4089.64 Da. (B) Molecular mass of HWTX-IV, 4107.94 Da. (C) Monoisotopic mass spectrum of a mixture of mHWTX-IV and HWTX-IV.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

MS/MS spectrum for sequence determination of the first fragment of mHWTX-IV (A) and of HWTX-IV (B) after digestion with trypsin.

The sequence was derived from the series of b-ions and y-ions.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

MS/MS spectrum for sequence determination of the N-terminal fragment of reduced and carboxamidomethylated mHWTX-IV.

Sequence was derived from the series of b-ions and y-ions.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Effects of HWTX-IV and mHWTX-IV on sodium channel in rat DRG neurons.

All current traces were evoked by a 50-ms step depolarization to −10 mV from a holding potential of −80 mV at every second. The currents of TTX-S were significantly reduced by 1-µM HWTX-IV (A) and 1-μM mHWTX-IV (C); 10-µM HWTX-IV (B) and 10-μM mHWTX-IV (D) had no effect on TTX-R sodium currents. (E) shows the concentration dependent inhibition of TTX-S sodium currents on DRG neurons by HWTX-IV (B) and mHWTX-IV. Control for each panel means no toxin treatment. Every data point (mean ± S.E) was obtained from five separate experimental cells.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Effects of HWTX-IV and mHWTX-IV on the kinetics of TTX-S sodium channels in rat DRG neurons.

Time course for block of TTX-S currents and reversal of block by mHWTX-IV (A) and HWTX-IV (B). Current-voltage (I–V) relationships of sodium currents before and after adding 100 nM mHWTX-IV (AC), HWTX-IV (BD). HWTX-IV and mHWTX-IV showed no obvious difference on the steady-state activation (CE) and inactivation (DF). Control for each panel means no toxin treatment. Every data point (mean ± S.E.) was obtained from five separate experimental cells. The data points for both activation and inactivation kinetics were well fitted with the Boltzmann equation.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Figure 7.

Sodium current recording after the application of mHWTX-IV detected by strong depolarization.

(A) DRG neurons were held at −80 mV and then with a 50 ms test pulse of −10 mV. A +200 mV 500 ms strong depolarization applied after cell back held at −80 mV. Finally, a −10 mV pulse used to test the currents. After the +200 mV strong depolarization, no current was induced. (B) Recovery of current from Nav1.7 following strong depolarization in the presence of 1 µM HWTX-IV or 1 µM mHWTX-IV. HEK293 cells were depolarized to +200, +150, +100 and +50 mV. Control for each panel means no toxin treatment. Every data point (mean ± S.E.) was obtained from five separate experimental cells.

More »

Figure 7 Expand