Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Average time-activity curves for [18F]FDG (a) and [18F]FECT (b), expressing uptake in the cerebral cortex (○), caudate-putamen (□) and cerebellum (Δ).

For [18F]FECT, specific-to-non-specific ratio (caudate-putamen to cerebellum (◊)) is also shown.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Schematic representation of the functional PET atlases construction pathway.

The full arrows express the followed procedure, the arrows in dotted line the objective. On the standardized atlases a stereotactic grid is shown (2 mm interlines).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Spatial correspondence achieved between the anatomical landmarks defined in the MRM image and the corresponding co-ordinates in Paxinos space.

Points marked with open symbols signify the MRM space, whereas points denoted with full symbols belong to the Paxinos space.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

[18F]FDG and [18F]FECT probabilistic atlases.

(a) Series of axial sections (ventral to dorsal, slice interval 1.2 mm, radiological orientated) through the mouse brain MRM atlas (top row) and co-registered [18F]FDG (middle row) and [18F]FECT (bottom row) small-animal PET template. (b) One representative coronal (radiological orientation) and sagittal slice through caudate-putamen. (c) Horizontal section through variance map at level z = −2.8 (relative to bregma). The mouse brain MRM atlas shows the pre-defined VOI map over-layed. Color bars indicate relative intensities for [18F]FDG; binding potential for [18F]FECT.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 1.

Mean [18F]FDG and [18F]FECT uptake, intersubject variability, test-retest and right-to-left asymmetry indices obtained using pre-defined VOI-analysis.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 5.

(a) Representative fit of the cortical [18F]FDG time-activity-curve using a 3-compartment model (dashed line) and liver input function (solid line).

(b) Comparison of regional values of cMRglc derived from a 3-compartment model fit to SUVglc measured between 45 min and 60 min post injection. Solid line linear regression; spearman r = 0.73; p<0.0001.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Table 2.

Regional K*FDG, K1/k2, k3 and k4 estimates of [18F]FDG obtained from the mice scanned over 90 min using a 3-compartment model and liver input function.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 6.

Statistical parametric maps of 6-OHDA mice.

Differences for the brain-regions have been color-coded and are superimposed on the MRM template. Series of axial sections with t-maps rendered on the MRM atlas of the mouse brain show significant reductions in glucose metabolism (a) and DAT availability (b). The colored bars on the right express T-score levels. The intersection points of the axial planes have been set to the position of the right caudate-putamen, i.e. (x,y) = (−1.8, 0.2) and (x,y) = (−2.0, 0.0) for [18F]FDG and [18F]FECT, respectively. Images are in radiological convention.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Table 3.

Estimates of registration accuracy for a simulated [18F]FDG and [18F]FECT image of a control and a 6-OHDA-lesioned animal, derived from the VOI map, after re-registration of randomly misaligned data.

More »

Table 3 Expand