Table 1.
The public goods game.
Figure 1.
Collective goal.
Figure 2.
Participants during the manipulation task.
Figure 3.
Investments and expectations in the public goods game.
Each observation represents the amount invested or expected to be invested. Participants in the transparent condition show significantly higher investment levels, and subsequently higher expectations about the investment of the other player (n = 48).
Table 2.
In the transparent condition participants' investment is 34.6% higher than in the opaque condition, and the median investment is 100, compared to a median of only 50.
Figure 4.
Synchronization of behavior and emotions.
Participants in the transparent condition have reported happier emotions about their participation, whereas participants in the opaque condition reported mixed emotions.