Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Prior distributions of the hyperparameters for the ZIP and hurdle models.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Proportion of farmers who detected, reported or failed to report abortions during the 2006–2011 period.

The proportion of notifying farmers (; dotted blue line and red diamond shape) was calculated as the ratio of the observed number of farmers who reported at least one abortion to the total number of farmers. The proportion of farmers who detected at least one abortion (; grey) and the proportion of under-reporting farmers (; light green) were estimated from the ZIP model. In 2010/2011, 60.6% [95% confidence interval: 52.4–72.2] of farmers detected at least one abortion (i.e. ;); among them, 20.0% reported at least one abortion (i.e. ). The proportion of under-reporting farmers was estimated to be 66.4% [62.2–72.0].

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 2.

Odds ratios (OR) for the probability of detecting at least one abortion in cattle.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Proportion of farmers who detected and failed to report abortion by production type.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Relative risks (RR) for the number of abortion notification(s) by farmers who detected abortion(s).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Odds ratios (OR) for the probability of reporting abortion(s) in cattle.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Relative risks (RR) for the number of abortion notification(s) by notifying farmers.

More »

Table 6 Expand