Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Testing schedule.

Δ: maximal grip force testing. ▪: countermovement jump and multiple single-leg hop tests; ▴: first of five days wearing the actibelt® device for activity level measurements. □; questionnaires for assessment of motivational state. Vertical lines indicate the start and end of the isolation phase.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Physical activity and neuromuscular variables at first measurement.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Physical activity during isolation.

Values are mean (SD) percentage change compared to first measurement. *: p<0.05; †: p<0.01; ‡: p<0.001 and give the significance of the change. The variables measured at the same time-points have been offset slightly. Average gait speed and distance walked were significantly increased when subjects were scheduled to perform running exercises (days 71–141, 285–354 and 451–520 of isolation; statistical analyses not shown).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Reductions in countermovement jump power (top) but not height (bottom).

Values are mean (SD) percentage change compared to first measurement. *: p<0.05; †: p<0.01; ‡: p<0.001 and give the significance of the change.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Reductions in single-leg hop force (top) but not grip force (bottom).

Values are mean (SD) percentage change compared to first measurement. *: p<0.05; †: p<0.01; ‡: p<0.001 and give the significance of the change.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Boxplots of subjective motivation level over the course of isolation.

Non-parametric form of repeated measures analysis of variance showed no significant changes over time (p = 0.20). *: p = 0.045 on Wilcoxon-test versus pre-isolation.

More »

Figure 5 Expand