Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Image from a typical patient with mandibular deviation.

Anterior X-ray film. The lengths of the mandibular rami have an obvious difference. The vertical distance from the chin ridge to the inferior orbital fissure line is greater than 2 mm.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Image from a typical volunteer.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Anterior X-ray film of head.

The midpoints of the inferior orbital fissures were designated as points A and B, and the midpoint of the chin ridge was as point C.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Standing anteroposterior X-ray film of the full-length spine.

The midpoint of the 7th cervical vertebra was designated as point D, the midpoint of pubic symphysis point E, and the shoulder peaks as points F and G. In the cervical and thoracic vertebrae, the midpoints of the upper most scoliotic vertebra were designated as points H and I.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 1.

The difference analysis between Patients group and Control group.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 5.

The correlation analysis of mandibular deviation with scoliosis or trunk balance.

A. The degree of scoliosis in the cervical vertebrae had a positive, linear correlation with the degree of mandibular deviation. B. The degree of scoliosis in the thoracolumbar vertebrae had a positive, linear correlation with the degree of mandibular deviation. C. The imbalanced angle of the shoulders had a positive, linear correlation with the degree of mandibular deviation. D. The imbalanced angle of the trunk had a positive correlation with the degree of mandibular deviation, but there was no linear trend.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Table 2.

The Bivariate Pearson correlation analysis.

More »

Table 2 Expand