Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Map of Australia showing Tasmania.

The arrow indicates the 68 000 km2 island State of Tasmania to the south of the continental mainland of Australia. Map courtesy of Geoscience Australia.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Map of Tasmania showing study sites.

Each site is represented by a black dot.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Map of camera placement within the Tasman Peninsula.

An example of the spatial arrangement of cameras along roads and trails within a study site.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 1.

Vegetation associated with camera sites.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 4.

A Tasmanian devil Sarcophilus harrisii, scent-marking a camera station with an anal drag.

Note the curved tail, raised hind foot, and posterior part of the body touching the ground. Scent-marking was often observed in a series of photographs and was evidenced by anal-dragging, defecating or urinating.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

A swamp rat, Rattus lutreolus velutinus, visiting a camera station.

Note the distinctive equal head-body compared to tail length, and ears that are set close to the head.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Table 2.

Animal occurrences at cameras.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Model selection statistics for Tasmanian devils and feral cats.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 6.

The probability of detecting feral cats Felis catus in relation to Tasmanian devils Sarcophilus harrisii.

Study sites represented are: A. Southwest, B. Mt Field and C. Tasman Peninsula. Trends are shown as a function of time since baiting; cameras were initially baited on day one and re-baited on day seven. Estimates of probability of detection were generated in PRESENCE 4.0 under the highest-ranked AICc model in a two-species multi-season analysis. Bars represent 95% CI.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Table 4.

Model selection statistics for Tasmanian devils and swamp rats.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Model selection statistics for feral cats and swamp rats.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Model outputs from two-species occupancy models for Tasmanian devils and feral cats.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Model outputs from two-species occupancy models for Tasmanian devils and swamp rats.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Model outputs from two-species occupancy models for feral cats and swamp rats.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Figure 7.

Captures (n = 46) of swamp rat Rattus lutreolus in Elliott traps scented with different faecal odours.

Traps were scented with one of four different odours: clear (no faecal smear), Tasmanian pademelon Thylogale billardierii faeces, Tasmanian devil Sarcophilus harrisii faeces and feral cat Felis catus faeces.

More »

Figure 7 Expand

Table 9.

Swamp Rat captures in scented traps.

More »

Table 9 Expand