Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Clinical features of all patients.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Examples of saccadic intrusions in a control subject, a PSP patient, a PD patient, a CBS patient, a MSA patient and a SCASI patient.

SWJs were present in all subject groups, although they were smaller and less frequent in healthy controls. Each trace represents a 5 s recording of horizontal eye positions containing SWJs. Horizontal position and timescales for all traces are as in the bottom trace.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

A common square-wave coupling mechanism.

A) Correlation between saccade size and likelihood of being part of a SWJ. B) Intra-SWJ intervals across groups. C) Position error (see Methods for details) at the end of the first versus second saccade in a SWJ. D) Relationship between the estimated position error at the end of each saccade and the inter-saccadic interval to the next saccade. Error bars in all panels represent the standard error of the mean across subjects.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Characteristics of fixational saccades across subject groups.

First row, saccadic peak velocity/magnitude relationships. Second row, saccadic duration/magnitude relationships. Third row, saccade magnitude distributions. Fourth row, polar histograms of saccade directions. Each graph shows the combined data for all subjects in each group.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Saccadic parameters in PD patients, PSP patients and healthy controls.

Saccade rates, magnitudes, peak velocity-magnitude relationship slopes and vertical components (of saccade direction) are indicated. Bars represent the average value across subjects of each group and the error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. Asterisks show significance (p<0.05, t-test).

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 2.

Saccadic parameters in PD patients, PSP patients and healthy controls.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 5.

Microsaccade triggering model [14].

SC neurons present two gradients of connectivity, one that is strongest between rostral SC and OPNs, and one that is strongest between caudal SC and EBNs and IBNs [59][61] (longer lines represent stronger connections). The mutually inhibited OPNs and IBNs act as a trigger. During fixation, rostral SC activity drives the OPNs that inhibit the EBNs and IBNs. Directly preceding the launch of a microsaccade, activity in the rostral area shifts slightly caudally. At some point the balance of inhibition is broken, and the IBNs inhibit the OPNs more than the OPNs inhibit the IBNs. Then the EBNs start to burst initiating the microsaccade. Note that this representation is a one-dimension simplification of the circuit. The circuit functions in the same manner for vertical (up and down) BNs. Minus signs indicate inhibitory connections, plus signs excitatory ones.

More »

Figure 5 Expand