Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Structure of sampled groups.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Group specific FIS indices.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Detection of multiple paternity.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 1.

Mean within-group pairwise relatedness estimates.

Grey lines represent permuted 95% confidence intervals around the null hypothesis of zero relatedness and error bars represent bootstrapped confidence intervals around the mean. a, for the entire group during breeding season; b, for the female members of the group during breeding season; c, for the male members of the group during breeding season; d, for the entire group during non-breeding season; e, for the female members of the group during non-breeding season; f, for the male members of the group during non-breeding season.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Comparison of within-group pairwise relatedness estimates.

B, the entire group during breeding season; NB, the entire group during non-breeding season; BF, the female members of the group during breeding season; NBF, the female members of the group during non-breeding season; BM, the male members of the group during breeding season; NBM, the male members of the group during non-breeding season.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Comparison of the number of individual pairs identified as close relatives (r ≥0.25) among groups.

FF, female-female pairs; MF, female-male pairs; MM, male-male pairs.

More »

Figure 3 Expand