Table 1.
Numerical results of SPM comparisons between 18F-FDG uptake in PET0 (n = 8) and PET1 (n = 8).
Figure 1.
T1 MRI superimposition showing the cluster of voxels in the right parahippocampal gyrus (BAs 34 and 28) in which 18F-FDG uptake was significantly higher at PET0 (n = 8) as compared to PET1 (n = 8) (on the left sagittal and on the right coronal projections).
Coordinates and regional details are presented in Table 1.
Figure 2.
T1 MRI superimposition showing the cluster of voxels in the superior temporal gyrus (BA 38) in which 18F-FDG uptake was significantly higher at PET0 (n = 8) as compared to PET1 (n = 8) (on the left sagittal and on the right coronal projections).
Coordinates and regional details are presented in Table 1.
Table 2.
Numerical results of SPM comparisons between 18F-FDG uptake in CG (n = 30) and PET0 (n = 8).
Figure 3.
Mean and standard deviations of patients scores in the questionnaires on Balance (Gomez-Alvarez and Jauregui-Renaud, 2011), Anxiety (Zung, 1971), and Depersonalization/Derealization scales (Dep/Der, Cox and Swinson, 2002) at PET0 and PET1.
Figure 4.
Hystogram showing the values of the three tests scores and the metabolism in the cluster of voxels showing statistically significant hypometabolism at PET0 as compared to PET1 (A) and viceversa (B).
The mean of glucose metabolism values in the eight patients are expressed as percent of the values found in cerebellum.