Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients in the AMH and GOERM cohorts.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

AMH data (dots) plotted on a logarithmic scale with smoothed mean (dashed line) similar to ref.19, and an estimate of the mean as a quadratic function of age (solid line) with upper and lower 95% confidence limits (dotted lines).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Age-dependent AMH-percentiles: 5% & 95% (dotted lines), 10% & 90% (dash-dot-dash lines), 25% & 75% (dashed lines), and 50% or median (solid line), with • denoting AMH level 2.5 ng/mL at age 30 years.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

(a)–(f): comparisons of cumulative frequency distributions of age at menopause from the GOERM study (solid lines) and model-based predictions from AMH falling below a critical threshold (dashed lines) for different BMI categories and smoking status, showing quite good concordance between these.

a): normal weight non-smokers ; (b): normal weight current or past smokers ; (c): over-weight non-smokers ; (d): over-weight current or past smokers ; (e): obese non-smokers; (f): obese current or past smokers.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 2.

Estimated thresholds below which AMH predicts menopause (with 95% confidence intervals in brackets) according to smoking status and BMI categories.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Estimated percentiles of the probability distributions of age at menopause (± standard errors in brackets) predicted by AMH falling below critical thresholds according to smoking status and BMI categories.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Estimated percentiles of the probability distribution of age at menopause (± standard errors in brackets) predicted by AMH falling below a critical threshold ignoring smoking status and BMI categories.

More »

Table 4 Expand