Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

The baseline algorithm, in which only user-specific training samples are used, and new training samples are generated randomly from the

classes online.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

The TL algorithm, in which primary and auxiliary training samples are used together in determining the optimal

in the kNN classifier.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

The ACS algorithm, in which the classes from which new training samples are generated are determined based on per-class cross-validation performance.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Methods to combine TL with ACS and AL.

Left: Combining TL and ACS; Right: Combining TL and AL.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

The TL+ACS algorithm, which uses TL to determine the optimal

and ACS to generate new training samples.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

The Humvee Stroop scenarios.

Left: Color naming; Middle: Word reading; Right: Interference.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Table 1.

Mean and standard deviation of two performance measures in different scenarios.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

The 29 features used by the kNN and SVM classifiers.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 7.

Coefficients of the first two principle components of the 29 features.

More »

Figure 7 Expand

Figure 8.

Performances of the four kNN classifiers on the 18 subjects for

. The horizontal axis shows , and the vertical axis shows the testing accuracy on the examples from the same subject.

More »

Figure 8 Expand

Figure 9.

Mean and standard deviation (std) of the four kNN classifiers on the 18 subjects.

is the number of primary training samples generated in each iteration.

More »

Figure 9 Expand

Table 3.

Average classification accuracy for the four methods.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Paired -test results () on classification accuracy.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Figure 10.

Mean and standard deviation of the percentage of primary training samples saved by TL, ACS, and TL+ACS over the baseline approach, when the kNN classifier is used.

is the number of primary training samples generated in each iteration.

More »

Figure 10 Expand

Table 5.

Average percentage of saved primary training samples over the baseline method.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Paired -test results () on percentage of saved primary training samples.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Figure 11.

Performances of the four SVM classifiers on the 18 subjects for

. The horizontal axis shows , and the vertical axis shows the testing accuracy on the examples from the same subject.

More »

Figure 11 Expand

Figure 12.

Mean and standard deviation (std) of the four SVM classifiers on the 18 subjects.

is the number of primary training samples generated in each iteration.

More »

Figure 12 Expand

Figure 13.

Mean and standard deviation of the percentage of primary training samples saved by TL, ACS, and TL+ACS over the baseline approach, when the SVM classifier is used.

is the number of primary training samples generated in each iteration.

More »

Figure 13 Expand

Figure 14.

Comparison of the kNN and SVM classifiers for

.

More »

Figure 14 Expand