Figure 1.
SDS-PAGE analysis of the cell extract with RSFP protein and the purified enzyme.
Protein weight marker (lane M), cell extract of E. coli LMG194/pBADRSFP (lane A), pooled fraction after Fractogel EMD DEAE chromatography (lane B), pooled fraction after Resource Q chromatography (lane C).
Figure 2.
The pink fluorescence assay: RB in PBS buffer (A), PBS buffer (B), RB+RSFP in PBS buffer (C), RSFP in PBS buffer (D), RB+E. coli LMG194/pBADRSFP cell lysate in PBS buffer (E), E. coli LMG194/pBADRSFP cell lysate in PBS buffer (F), RB+E. coli LMG194/pBADMycHisA cell lysate in PBS buffer (G), and E. coli LMG194/pBADMycHisA cell lysate in PBS buffer (H).
Figure 3.
The UV-VIS absorption spectra of rhodamine B (RB; 1.75×10−3 g L−1) and RSFP protein (0.023 g L−1).
Figure 4.
The emission spectra of rhodamine B (RB; 1.225×10−3 g L−1) and RSFP protein (0.081 g L−1).
Figure 5.
The UV-VIS absorption spectra of rhodamine B (green and blue lines) in the presence of the different concentration of RSFP protein, respectively, and the UV-VIS absorption spectrum of rhodamine B in the absence of RSFP protein (pink line).
The concentration of RSFP protein in the first analyzed sample (green line) was twice higher than the concentration of RSFP protein (0.023 g L−1) in the second one (blue line), respectively. The concentration of RB (3.5×10−4 g L−1) was the same in the all assayed samples.
Figure 6.
The UV-VIS absorption spectra of rhodamine B (brown and orange lines) in the presence of the different concentration of E. coli proteins, respectively, and the UV-VIS absorption spectrum of rhodamine B in the absence of E. coli proteins (pink line).
The concentration of E. coli proteins in the first analyzed sample (brown line) was twice higher than the concentration of E. coli proteins (0.023 g L−1) in the second one (orange line), respectively. The concentration of RB (3.5×10−4 g L−1) was the same in the all assayed samples.
Figure 7.
The emission spectra of rhodamine B (RB) in the presence of the different concentration of RSFP protein or E. coli proteins (Lys).
The concentrations of RSFP protein (0.162 gL−1, green) and E. coli proteins (0.162 g L−1, orange) were twice higher than the level of RSFP protein (0.081 g L−1, blue) and E. coli proteins (0.081 g L−1, brown) in the analogous experiments, respectively. The concentration of RB was 1.225×10−3 g L−1.
Table 1.
X-ray data collection and crystal structure refinement statistics.
Figure 8.
Alignment of apo RSFP form (blue) and its complex with RB (deep pink): (A) general view of monomers, (B) enlargement of loop I19-L30 with shown difference in location of S22, Y25 and F61 caused by interaction with phosphate ion and RB molecule.
Figure 9.
Interactions of RB with RSFP: (A) trimmer of RSFP with visible RB molecules on the interface between monomers; (B) binding site of RB1 interacting with neighbouring monomer (deep pink and violet); (C) binding site of RB2.
Figure 10.
Surface electrostatic potential: (A) Trimmer of RSFP shown in orientation with the 3-fold axis in the figure plane; (B) zoom of the binding cleft.