Table 1.
Timelines and MSIS-29 scores of the cohort.
Figure 1.
Proportions of respondents with low moderate and high MSIS-29-PHYS and MSIS-29-PSYCH scores.
The scores were divided into tertiles: low moderate and high, and the proportions of respondents in each tertile for MSIS-29-PHYS and MSIS-29-PSYCH were compared.
Table 2.
Frequencies of low, moderate and high MSIS-29 scores among the cohort.
Figure 2.
The MSIS-29-PHYS scores by type of MS.
The relative MSIS-29-PHYS scores of people who report having different types of MS are indicated.
Figure 3.
The MSIS-29-PSYCH scores by type of MS.
The relative MSIS-29-PSYCH scores of people who report having different types of MS are indicated.
Figure 4.
The MSIS-29-PHYS scores for people of workforce age.
The scores of people who report they are sick/disabled ( = 1) were compared with those who are not sick/disabled ( = 0).
Figure 5.
The MSIS-29-PSYCH scores for people of workforce age.
The scores of people who report they are sick/disabled ( = 1) were compared with those who are not sick/disabled ( = 0).
Figure 6.
Odds ratios of the workforce being sick/disabled.
Logistic regression was conducted to predict the odds of members of the workforce being sick/disabled based on their MSIS-29-PHYS scores in bands of 10 (above the minimum score of 20), relative to the lowest band (up 30). The upper and lower confidence intervals are indicated by vertical lines.