Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Patient and sequencing run characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Relative abundance of dominant bacterial phyla in TB and control samples.

Only phyla >1% in either group were included.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Relative abundance of dominant bacterial phyla in all individuals under study.

Only phyla >1% in either group were included. The 22 samples on the left were from the TB patients, and the 14 samples on the right were from the control group.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

PCoA plots of TB and control samples.

The plots were based on a) weighted and b) unweighted UniFrac distances. The two principal coordinates combined explained 66.44% and 24.31% of the variations in the weighted and unweighted cases, respectively. Red dots represent TB samples; blue dots represent control samples.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Relative abundance of dominant bacterial genera in TB and control samples.

Only genera >1% in either group were included.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Prevalence of dominant bacterial genera in TB (n = 22) and control (n = 14) samples.

Only genera >1% in either group were included.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Relative abundance of dominant bacterial genera in all individuals under study.

Only genera >1% in either group were included. The 22 samples on the left were from the TB patients, and the 14 samples on the right were from the control group.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Table 2.

List of abundant OTUs composing the three major bacterial genera.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

List of genera and species significantly different between TB and control groups.

More »

Table 3 Expand