Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Patient enrollment and participation flow chart.

* Patients were enrolled on the Intermittent dosing schedule first, and then enrolled on the daily dosing schedule.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Demographics, baseline characteristics and cancer history (safety population).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Waterfall plot for best percentage change from baseline in tumor measurement (safety population).

*Patients with MET gene amplification (third individual discontinued therapy before tumor measurement).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 2.

Tumor response and disease stabilization (evaluable population).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Treatment-related AEs of all grades reported by ≥10% of patients in either cohort (safety population) and treatment-related AEs of grade 3 and 4.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 3.

Plasma concentrations of foretinib (A), sMET (B), VEGF-A (C) and sVEGFR2 (D) at days 1 and 5, which encompass the first dosing interval of the intermittent 5/9 dosing group.

Box and whisker plots show median ±25% within the box and 100% range of all values within whiskers. Median values for plasma foretinib and each marker shown change significantly over this interval (P<0.0001). Other significant marker changes are discussed in the text.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Plasma concentrations of sMET (left) and VEGF-A (right) correlate significantly with tumor burden (sum of longest diameters, SLD) at week 8.

Spearman R values were 0.5157 (P = 0.0099) and 0.6216 (P = 0.0012) for sMET and VEGF-A, respectively. The dotted lines indicate 95% confidence intervals.

More »

Figure 4 Expand