Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

FDA-approved pictorial warning label images.

This document includes images of the nine FDA-approved pictorial warning label images used in this study. Reprinted from http://www.fda.gov under a CC BY license, with permission from the FDA, copyright 2012.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Consort 2010 Flow Diagram.

This figure provides information on the study sample for assessment of eligibility (n = 5,359), the number excluded (n = 1,988) and randomized (n = 3,371), as well as the number allocated, followed up and analyzed for the experimental condition (n = 1,706) and control condition (n = 1,665).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 1.

Sample demographics overall and by condition.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Mean scores or percentages for text-only vs. text+pictorial condition for each outcome by demographic subgroups.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Adjusted regressions for main effects model (experimental condition, race/ethnicity, education, income and covariates) for each outcome.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 3.

Percentage indicating intention to quit by education level.

This figure shows the percentages reporting intention to quit in the next 30 days (yes/no) by exposure to the control or experimental condition for each level of education (high school or less/some college/college or more). In adjusted regression models, the interaction for experimental condition by education was marginally significant at p = .057. The figure indicates a stronger effect for the pictorial condition versus the text-only condition among individuals with moderate education compared with higher educated groups.

More »

Figure 3 Expand