Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Location of eight study forest sites.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Relationships between community biomass and soil nutrient measures.

PF indicates the pine forest. * P<0.05; *** P<0.001.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Relationships between litterfall C, N and P productions and soil nutrient measures.

PF indicates the pine forest. ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Relationships between forest floor turnover rate with F/H layer N:P ratio.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 1.

Summary of regressions of forest floor turnover rates against nutrient measures of forest floors.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Correlations between nutrient measures in the plant and soil samples.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Correlations of nutrient measures between the plant and soil samples.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Selected characteristics of the 0–15 cm mineral soil.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Mean N and P concentrations of plant materials of eight study forests.

Dashed lines depict N:P ratios of 16, 20 and 25 on a mass basis. Ratios of 16 and 20 are P limitation thresholds of plant growth proposed by Koerselman and Meuleman (1996) [34] and Güsewell (2004) [31], respectively; ratio of 25 is the critcial N:P ratio that indicates P limitation on litter decomposition proposed by Güsewell and Verhoeven (2006) [61].

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Table 5.

Statistical characteristics of nutrient measures of selected plant materials.

More »

Table 5 Expand