Figure 1.
Sampling design and households surveyed around Kanha National Park.
Table 1.
Household characteristics of 735 surveyed households around Kanha.
Table 2.
Details on variables collected from surveys and used in models.
Figure 2.
Mitigation measures reported by surveyed households around Kanha National Park.
Table 3.
Top models (cumulative weight>0.95) and beta coefficients for predicting household crop loss around Kanha National Park.
Table 4.
Top models (cumulative weight >0.95) and beta coefficients for predicting household livestock loss around Kanha National Park.
Figure 3.
Predicted crop loss within 20 km around Kanha National Park (dark green is the administrative buffer).
Kriging generates probabilities for crop loss in the landscape with blue areas depicting low risk and red areas depicting high risk.
Figure 4.
Predicted livestock predation loss within 15 km around Kanha National Park (dark green is the administrative buffer).
Kriging generates probabilities for livestock loss in the landscape with blue areas depicting low risk and red areas depicting high risk.
Table 5.
Top models (cumulative weight >0.95) and beta coefficients for predicting household compensation distribution around Kanha National Park.
Table 6.
Comparison loss and compensation reported by households surveyed inside and outside administrative buffer around Kanha National Park.
Figure 5.
Predicted compensation distribution for households within 20 km around Kanha National Park.
Household probabilities of receiving compensation in the landscape are generated by Kriging with blue areas depict low compensation and red areas depicting high compensation.