Figure 1.
Averages of invertebrate community variables across the experimental treatments sampled on days 18 and 30 combined.
Error bars (SEs) show the within-channel variation (n = 3) that is represented by the factor ‘sample’ in the statistical analysis (see text). Text in rectangles indicates significant single-factor effects (nutrients: N, sediment: S and temperature: T) or interactions.
Table 1.
Invertebrate responses to the experimental treatments.
Figure 2.
Abundance patterns (averages +SEs) for common invertebrate taxa (days 18 and 30 combined) that showed significant interactions between paired manipulated factors.
For more details see Fig. 1.
Figure 3.
Averages of leaf decay variables (sampled on day 18) and algal community/biomass variables (sampled on day 29) across the experimental treatments.
For more details see Fig. 1.
Table 2.
Leaf decomposition and algal responses to the experimental treatments.
Figure 4.
Density patterns (averages +SEs) for the common benthic algal taxa sampled on day 29 that showed significant interactions between paired manipulated factors.
For more details see Fig. 1.
Figure 5.
Relative abundance patterns (averages +SEs) for the benthic algal growth form classifications sampled on day 29.
For more details see Fig. 1.
Table 3.
Overview of results for biological response variables.
Figure 6.
Diagram of the experimental design, showing the 6 inflow pipes (above) and the combinations of ambient and augmented stressors applied to each of the 18 channels.
Table 4.
Algal growth form classification.