Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Notation used to denote the main effects and model structure for multistate mark-recapture models.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Reproductive performance measures for healthy and diseased great tit pairs at Wytham Woods.

(a) average number of young fledged; (b) average number of independent young raised; (c) the proportion of pairs with at least one fledged young; (d) the proportion of pairs raising at least one independent young. Shown are the average estimates from the raw data (±95% CI).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 2.

The impacts of Paridae pox on reproductive performance of great tits.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

The impact of Paridae pox on monthly recapture, survival and transitions rates of great tits.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 2.

The impact of disease state on great tit monthly survival rates.

Estimates shown are for (a) first years and (b) older individuals (white bars show healthy females; light grey bars show healthy males, dark grey bars show values for all diseased individuals). Estimates are model averaged mean monthly survival rates (±95% CI) obtained from multistate mark–recapture models.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

The influence of Paridae pox impacts and prevalence on great tit population growth rate.

Results of the age-structured matrix model analysis to assess the influence of Paridae pox impacts and prevalence on the population growth rate (Lambda, λ) of the great tit population: (a) mean population growth rates (±95% CI) obtained from 10000 model runs in which pox impacts were incorporated on fertility rates alone (white bars), survival rates alone (grey bars), or on both vital rates together (black bars), and pox prevalence varied from 0% to 15%; (b) the proportion of each of the 10000 runs which gave λ ≥1.

More »

Figure 3 Expand