Figure 1.
Activity (resting, preening and foraging) of control and treated quail in their home cage, at the end of the stress procedure (in %, means ±SEM).
ANOVA, **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.
Figure 2.
Spatial learning success rates of control and treated quail, for the first block of trials (1 to 3) and for the second block of trials (4 to 6).
Student t test compared to 50%: *P<0.05, **P<0.01; ANOVA, treatment effect: † P<0.05.
Figure 3.
Mean latencies to reach the food in the spatial learning test for all quail from the three genetic lines, A: for the trial 1 to 3 (ANOVA, genetic line: P = 0.002, PLSD fisher test: **P<0.01, ***P<0.001), B: for trial 4 to 6 (ANOVA, P>0.05) and C: for the retrieval test (ANOVA, P>0.05).