Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Estimated soil-water partition coefficient Kd (Sauvé regression) vs. measured Kd (determined from CaCl2 extractions).

The dotted line indicates a ratio of one.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Comparison of predicted and measured concentrations in top soil for the five treatments.

September 1998 to July 2007. Model predictions are connected by lines for clearer comparison to measured values. Vertical lines denote the range of measured values and arrows the time of amendment application. Measured concentrations represent median of four replicates.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 1.

Modeled fluxes for top soil, CTR and BIOW treatments (August 2000–October 2001).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Amendment application (second half of September in each given year) and input of Cd and Pb with amendment for the different treatments.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Comparison of predicted and measured concentrations in plants (mg kg dw−1) for the five treatments.

October 1999 to July 2007. Model predictions are connected by lines for clearer comparison to measured values. Vertical lines denote the range of measured values and symbols the medians of the four replicates (values below QL were set equal to ½ QL (note that QLs from 1999–2005 were applied for all years). Top arrows recall the time of amendment application.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 3.

Estimated plant parameters (initial plant mass normalized to an area of 1 m2).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Simulated water balance and content of soil.

(a) Simulated annual water balance, control scenario, August 1998 to October 1999; (b) simulated water content of the five soil layers, same simulation event.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 4.

Measured soil parameters (depth, dry density ρS,dry, field capacity, FC, and permanent wilting point, PWP) of the soil layers.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Leaching of water (L m−2), Cd (mg m−2) and Pb (mg m−2) for the ten simulation events in the control scenario.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Figure 5.

Leaching of water from soil layer 2.

Model compared to measurement for CTR, MSW and GSW treatments. Model is average of all predictions, min and max is minimum and maximum lysimeter measurements, MSW(I) and CTR(II), respectively.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Table 6.

Calculated total mass of harvested plant parts (from results in dry weight, please see Text S2, Table S4).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Figure 6.

Overview of the field and simulation study.

For wheat and barley the starting point of growth takes place after seeding.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Figure 7.

Processes and compartments in the coupled soil solute transport, water balance and plant uptake model.

W: water content, GW: groundwater, CGW: groundwater concentration, CW: soil pore water concentration.

More »

Figure 7 Expand