Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Subject characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

A: Schematic diagram showing the positioning of the optical probe in the head of the subject. B: NIRS channel orientation.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 2.

Performance data during response inhibition tasks.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

The oxy-Hb concentration in the prefrontal cortex during response inhibition tasks.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 2.

The performance of the three groups during No-go task.

A: the reaction time of the No-go task; B: the oxy-Hb levels in the prefrontal cortex. Compared to TD, HFA and ADHD individuals required a longer reaction time during the No-go task. Both the reaction time and oxy-Hb level in the right prefrontal cortex are highest in HFA and lowest in TD. **: P<0.01; *: P<0.05.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

The performance of the three groups during incongruent task.

A: The reaction time of incongruent task; B: the oxy-Hb levels in the prefrontal cortex. HFA and ADHD individuals had lower oxy-Hb levels in the left and HFA and ADHD individuals had lower oxy-Hb levels in the left and inferior prefrontal areas, and longer reaction times, than typically developing children.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 4.

The correlations between the level of inactivation in the right prefrontal region and the behavioural performance at the inhibition Task.

More »

Table 4 Expand