Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Demographical data of CI users of the EEG study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Waveform of experimental stimuli.

A: Waveform of the overall stimuli; B: Different attack time manipulations of the stimuli.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Hit rates of CI users and NH controls (Asterisks indicate a significant above chance level p<0.05).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Grand average AEPs of CI users and NH controls.

A: Grand average AEPs of CI users and NH controls with topographies of the N1 for the three standard sounds with their corresponding latencies (SNA: Standard Normal Attack; SSA: Standard Shortened Attack, SPA: Standard Prolonged Attack). B: Grand average AEPs of CI users with (N = 6) and without (N = 6) musical training. All grand averages are deflections at Fz.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 2.

AEP latencies (ms) and amplitudes (µV) of CI users and NH controls (SD given in parentheses).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

MMN latencies and amplitudes of CI users and NH controls.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Grand average Mismatch Negativities.

Grand average MMNs of CI users and NH controls with their respective topographies. AEPs at Fz for standards (red) and deviants (blue) for CI users and NH controls. Significant MMNs in the difference wave (black) are marked with an arrow. The difference waves for reversed polarity were derived from the left mastoid (dotted black line).

More »

Figure 4 Expand