Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Experiment 1 trial sequence and displays. A) Sample trial sequence for a congruent (left) and incongruent (right) trial, under high load and low WML conditions respectively. B) Sample of the letter identification display in Experiment 1. C) Sample of the letter identification display in Experiment 2. Dashes represent possible target and distractor positions and were not displayed in the experiment.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Experiment 1 & 2: Mean correct reaction times (in milliseconds) and error rates on the memory task as a function of WML and WMC group.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Experiment 1: Mean correct reaction times (in milliseconds) and error rates on the letter identification task as a function of WML, congruency type, and WMC groups.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 2.

Experiment 1 RT congruency effects graph. Mean RTs congruency effect under low and high WML conditions, for the low and high WMC groups in Experiment 1. Error bars are standard errors.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

The proposed modulation of the Mexican-hat distribution as a function of WMC and WML.

The schematic representation illustrates the proposed dispersion of the Mexican-hat profile as a function of cognitive limitations and also explains the inverted-U pattern of congruency effects recorded at TD 4 in Experiment 1 & 2.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 3.

Experiment 2: Mean correct reaction times (in milliseconds) on the letter identification task as a function of WML, target to distractor distance, congruency type, and WMC Groups.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Experiment 2: Mean error rates on the letter identification task as a function of WML, target to distractor distance, congruency type, and WMC groups.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Figure 4.

Experiment 2 RT congruency effects graph. Mean congruency as a function of target-to-distractor distance in A) High and B) Low WMC groups under High and Low WML. Note that the typical Mexican-hat profile is evident in High WMC under Low Load, with a relatively strong congruency effect at distance d1 (first attention zone, a1), followed by weaker congruency at distance d2 (first suppression zone, s1), stronger congruency at distance d3 (second attention zone, a2), and finally weaker congruency at distance d4 (peripheral suppression or unattended zone, s2).

More »

Figure 4 Expand