Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Estimated FST values on complete dataset.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Effect of increasing sample sizes.

Results are shown for the simulations where allele frequencies were equally distributed from 0.05 to 0.95. The number of markers was fixed at k = 100 (left column) and k = 1,000 (right column). Each row contains a different level of genetic differentiation (FST = 0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4). The results (average FST and 95% CI) of each estimator are depicted in the different graphs: FSTW (blue circles), FSTC&W (purple squares) and FSTR (green triangles). The dashed red line indicates the actual FST for the simulated population.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Effect of increasing the number of markers.

Results are shown for the simulations where allele frequencies were equally distributed from 0.05 to 0.95. The number of individuals was fixed at n = 4 (left column) and n = 20 (right column). Each row contains (like in Figure 1) a different level of genetic differentiation (FST = 0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4). The results (average FST and 95% CI) of each estimator are depicted in the different graphs: FSTW (blue circles), FSTC&W (purple squares) and FSTR (green triangles). The dashed red line indicates the actual FST for the simulated population.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 2.

Estimated FST values changed allele frequency distributions, n = 50, k = 1000.

More »

Table 2 Expand