Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Formal Properties of English Abstract and Concrete Nouns.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Correlation Matrix of English Noun Psycholinguistic Variables (N = 2,877).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Stepwise multiple regression for variables predicting nonword concreteness.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 1.

Nonword Concreteness Agreement.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Nonword agreement as functions of acoustic duration and syllable length.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Single word semantic judgment accuracy and reaction time as functions of word length and concreteness.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 4.

Factor analysis/Component matrix for phonological and morphological variables.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Hierarchical multiple regression table predicting speeded naming latencies.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Figure 4.

Concreteness *form interaction effects in English noun naming.

Note: The graphs represent naming reaction times as functions of word concreteness. For visual presentation we binned abstract and concrete words via a median split on word concreteness: abstract <492 (on a 700 point scale) < concrete. Panel A represents reaction time differences for abstract versus concrete nouns matched across different phoneme lengths. Panel B represents reaction time differences for abstract versus concrete nouns matched across different syllable lengths.

More »

Figure 4 Expand