Figure 1.
Probabilistic calculation to estimate the adequacy of the usual intake of a nutrient.
Figure 2.
French implementation of the PANDiet: items, reference values and variabilities.
The Adequacy sub-score is composed of 21 items and the Moderation sub-score is composed of 6 items plus 12 potential penalty values. EIEA, Energy Intake Excluding Alcohol.
Figure 3.
US implementation of the PANDiet: items, reference values and variabilities.
The Adequacy sub-score is composed of 21 items and the Moderation sub-score is composed of 5 items plus 9 potential penalty values. EIEA, Energy Intake Excluding Alcohol.
Table 1.
PANDiet and individual item scores shown by quartiles and Spearman correlations between the PANDiet score and individual item scores for the French sample (n = 1330).
Table 2.
Regression coefficients and 95% CI from linear regression analysis.
Figure 4.
French implementation of the PANDiet and association with selected food groups.
Relative mean intake of each quartile shown as a percentage compared to the highest observed mean intake across the quartiles for selected foods among the French sample. ENNS 2006–2007.
Table 3.
PANDiet and individual item scores shown by quartiles and Spearman correlations between the PANDiet score and individual item scores for US sample (n = 2391).
Figure 5.
US implementation of the PANDiet and association with selected food groups.
Relative mean intake of each quartile shown as a percentage compared to the highest observed mean intake across the quartiles for selected foods among US sample. NHANES 2007–2008.