Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Aggregate visualized by SEM.

Aggregates from a post-exponential 8325-4 culture were fixed and visualized using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Panels A-D represent increasing magnification and red squares indicate the area magnified in the following panel. Overview of an aggregate, which is visible to the naked eye (A). Zooming in reveals pores and crevices in a topographical landscape of aggregated clusters (B). At higher magnifications it is revealed that some clusters are embedded in a web-like matrix (black arrows) while some are not (white arrows) (C, D).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Aggregate size distribution measured by LDA.

Four different S. aureus strains were investigated for their level of aggregation in post-exponential growth phase (OD600 = 2) (A). The two aggregating strains were followed through exponential growth and the percentage of cells in aggregates (>6 µm, solid bars) relative to the non-aggregating fraction (open bars) is shown (B). % total biovolume is calculated as the percentage of cells of a given size relative to the total suspended cell mass. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 5).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Kinetic of aggregate formation.

8325-4 cells were mixed 1∶1 with 8325-4 cells expressing YFP to OD600 of 0.01 and examined using CLSM every 30 min through a growth cycle. Small clusters of cells dominate until OD600 = 0.1 (A) at which time they start to fuse (B) and form large aggregates around OD600 = 0.5 (C). Note different sizes of scale bars.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Aggregation is influenced by the presence of sub-inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics.

8325-4 (panel A) and 15981 (panel B) were cultivated to OD600 of 2 in TSB (solid circle) or in TSB added 1/25×MIC of erythromycin (open triangles), cefuroxime (open circles) or rifampicin (open squares). The size distribution of planktonic aggregates was examined using LDA. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 5).

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Polysaccharide constitutes the extracellular matrix of 8325-4 aggregates.

Aggregates of 8325-4 cells were treated with DNase (tube 2), proteinase K (tube 3) or sodium metaperiodate (tube 5) at 37°C for 18 hours. Tubes 1 and 4 are untreated controls.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Production of the Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin (PIA).

Dot blot and immune-detection was used to determine the amount of PIA produced by different strains in post-exponential growth phase (A) or by strain 8325-4 after exposure to 1/25 MIC of different antibiotics (B).

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Figure 7.

Metabolic activity is significantly higher in aggregated compared to dispersed cells.

Metabolic activity was determined in a post-exponential (OD600 = 2) culture of 8325-4 by measuring reduced XTT (arbitrary units) normalized to mg dry weight (A). Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3). The distribution of active cells (green) and cells with low membrane potential (red) in aggregates was determined using LIVE/DEAD staining and CLSM (B).

More »

Figure 7 Expand

Figure 8.

Aggregated cells have increased survival after antibiotic treatment.

Cells in aggregates (solid bars) survive better than dispersed cells (open bars) following treatment with 25×MIC of kanamycin (KAN), ciprofloxacin (CIP), erythromycin (ERM) or vancomycin (VAN). Survival was calculated as CFU present in the aggregate and dispersed fractions after treatment with antibiotics relative to CFU measured before antibiotic exposure. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3).

More »

Figure 8 Expand

Table 1.

Strains and plasmids used in the study.

More »

Table 1 Expand