Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Study selection.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Systematic review of ethics committee approval and participant information and consent in reports of cluster randomized trials – characteristics of trials.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Systematic review of ethics committee approval and participant information and consent in reports of cluster randomized trials – reporting of ethics committee approval and participant information and consent.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Systematic review of ethics committee approval and participant information and consent in reports of cluster randomized trials – author survey of handling participant information and consent.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Systematic review of ethics committee approval and participant information and consent in reports of cluster randomized trials – author survey of cluster guardians.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Figure 2.

Risk of selection bias.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 5.

Systematic review of ethics committee approval and participant information and consent in reports of cluster randomized trials – discrepancies between author answers and reporting.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Authors' perception of management of participant informed consent in cluster randomized trials.

More »

Table 6 Expand