Figure 1.
COI phylogeny of the three darwinulid genera.
This phylogeny was obtained by Bayesian Inference. Height of triangles reflects the number of sequences. Triangles or single branches represent EG species, which are indicated by their geographic origin and Arabic numbers. Species names in red are split into two species by the GMYC method (but not by the K/θ method). Species names in black are recognized by both methods. Numbers above branches are bootstrap values of 1000 replicates for NJ and ML trees (>50%), numbers below branches are posterior probabilities of Bayesian Inference.
Table 1.
Summary of the analyses for the presence of darwinulid species with the GMYC method.
Table 2.
Summary of results of K/θ tests for darwinulid species with the COI data set.
Figure 2.
ITS phylogeny of the three darwinulid genera.
This phylogeny was obtained by Bayesian Inference. Height of triangles reflects the number of sequences. Triangles or single branches represent EG species, which are indicated by their geographic origin and Arabic numbers. Species names in blue are only recognized by the K/θ method (but not by the GMYC method). Species names in black are recognized by both methods. Numbers above branches are bootstrap values of 1000 replicates for NJ and ML trees (>50%), numbers below branches are posterior probabilities of Bayesian Inference.
Figure 3.
Global distribution of the EG species, determined by COI sequence data.
Letters and numbers in the map refer to the analyzed specimens (see Table S1 for more details). Different EG species are indicated by different color codes.
Figure 4.
Global distribution of the EG species, determined by ITS2 sequence data.
Letters and numbers in the map refer to the analyzed specimens (see Table S2 for more details). Different EG species are indicated by different color codes.