Table 1.
Description of species used in the study.
Table 2.
Estimates of the regression parameters from the best fit models for the field survey.
Figure 1.
Average germination fraction by species, from the field survey.
Different points represent each combination of location (coastal vs. inland) and vegetation type (coastal sage scrub, gray points vs. grassland, black points) for each species. Error bars are ±1 standard error.
Figure 2.
Average germination fraction by species as a function of soil moisture, from the field survey.
Points are the average germination fraction pooled by site. Black points are coastal sites and gray points are inland sites. Lines are the fitted soil moisture by location models for each species except Brassica, which shows the (moisture)2 model because it was a better fit.
Figure 3.
Average germination fraction from summer or winter with or without fungicide, from the field experiment.
Differences in germination between summer and winter for all species (with both fungicide treatments combined), (a), plotted by fungicide treatment for each species separately, (b). In (b), black dots are treatments with fungicide, and gray dots are without fungicide. Error bars are ±1 standard error.
Table 3.
Estimates of regression parameters from the best fit models for the field experiment.
Figure 4.
Average seed viability as a function of watering and fungicide treatments, from the laboratory experiment.
The top left panel is all species combined, and the rest are individual species. Moisture treatments are dry, pulse, and wet, and fungicide treatments are with (gray points) and without (black points) fungicide. Error bars are ±1 standard error.
Table 4.
Estimates of regression parameters from the best fit models for the laboratory experiment.