Table 1.
Comparison of markers mapped in two diploid populations, DRH and D84.
Table 2.
Distribution of mapped markers in DRH, D84 and the Infinium 8303 Potato Array.
Table 3.
Comparison of four diploid potato linkage maps: D84 and DRH maps (SNP based) and the ultra-high density (UHD) maps (AFLP-based [5]).
Figure 1.
Alignment of chromosome 1 from DRH (left) and D84 (right).
Table 4.
Markers with distorted segregation ratios in populations DRH and D84.
Table 5.
Position and size of blocks with distorted segregation.
Figure 2.
Graphs of DRH SNP marker position (cM) vs. D84 SNP marker position (cM) for all 12 potato chromosomes.
Table 6.
Summary of disconcordant markers for each of the mapping populations.
Table 7.
Mapped markers that were not anchored to the pseudomolecules.
Figure 3.
Graph of chromosome 4 (D84) showing the genetic location (cM) and the physical position (Mb) of 204 markers, and the estimated local recombination.
Figure 4.
Graph of chromosome 10 (D84) showing the genetic location (cM) and the physical position (Mb) of 98 markers, and the estimated local recombination.
A. Chromosome 10 from population D84 demonstrating poor concordance between physical and genetic position. B. Chromosome 10 from population D84 after correcting the order and orientation of the superscaffolds in the pseudomolecules.