Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Clinical data and treatment from CF patients included in the study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Microbiological data from CF patients included in the study.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 1.

Rarefaction curves.

These curves are representing the numbers of OTUs with respect to the number of pyrosequence reads obtained from each patient at different sampling times and using the two set of primers targeting prokaryotic 16S rDNA (A) and fungal ITS2 (B) loci.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 3.

Number of 16S-pyrosequencing reads assigned to each taxonomic group of Bacteria.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Number of ITS-pyrosequencing reads assigned to each taxonomic group of Fungi.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Figure 2.

Relation between species richness and clinical status (A) or lung function (B).

Total richness of prokaryotic and fungal communities from each patient-sample was expressed using the Chao1 richness estimator; each spot size is proportional to the corresponding Chao1 value. The clinical status is expressed as S-K score and BMI in Figure 2A, while lung function is expressed as FEV1 and FVC values in Figure 2B. Given to the absence of S-K score value from Patient 2-sample 2 (Table 1), this spot is missing in Figure 2A. Bacterial and fungal Chao1 values corresponding to Patient 1, Patient 2, Patient 3, and Patient 4 are represented in blue-, green-, red- and yellow-edged spots, respectively. Dark and light colour intensity is corresponding to the first and second sampling dates of each patient, respectively. Dark grey and light grey are corresponding to fungal and bacterial Chao1 richness values, respectively.

More »

Figure 2 Expand