Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Clinical data of SMA and Control Subjects.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Correlations of secondary measures with MHFMS and age for SMA subjects.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Results from primary outcome analysis across all seven “omic” platforms.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 1.

Illustration of the top 5 markers as candidate biomarkers by age.

The natural log intensity of the protein abundance of CILP2, TNXB, COMP, ADAMTSL4 and CLEC3B are shown by age (Panels A-E) across Types. Panels A-E generally show a trend for type but not age.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Illustration of the top 5 markers as candidate biomarkers by MFMHS.

The natural log intensity of the protein abundance of CILP2, TNXB, COMP, ADAMTSL4 and CLEC3B are shown by MHFMS (Panels A-E) across Types. Panels A-E again show a trend for type and MHFMS. Panels F-J shows the box plot distribution by type.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Illustration of the top 5 markers as candidate biomarkers by Type.

The natural log intensity of the protein abundance of CILP2, TNXB, COMP, ADAMTSL4 and CLEC3B are shown (Panels A-E) by Type. Error bars are expressed as standard errors.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 4.

Top 20 univariate MHFMS markers across platforms.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Top 20 univariate markers across all outcome measures.

More »

Table 5 Expand