Figure 1.
The procedure of face judgments.
A: the procedure of trustworthiness judgments; B: the procedure of attractiveness judgments; C: scale used in the trustworthiness judgments; D: scale used in the attractiveness judgments. In both tasks, the faces were presented with the scale underneath the face image.
Figure 2.
The correlations between attractiveness and trustworthiness judgments of Caucasian male faces by Caucasian and Chinese participants.
Table 1.
Facial features that significantly contributed to the trustworthiness judgments of Caucasian male faces by Caucasian and Chinese.
Figure 3.
Examples of facial cues for trustworthiness and attractiveness judgments by Caucasian and Chinese participants.
These facial features are adjusted in terms of −4, −2, 0, 2, and 4 SD from the mean.
Table 2.
Facial features that significantly contributed to the attractiveness judgments of Caucasian male faces by Caucasian and Chinese.
Figure 4.
Examples of facial cues for trustworthiness with attractiveness considered by Caucasian and Chinese participants.
These facial features are adjusted in terms of −4, −2, 0, 2, and 4 SD from the mean. Note that after controlling attractiveness, the facial cues of trustworthiness for Chinese only concluded skin shade (dark/light) which is shown in Fig. 3.
Table 3.
Comparisons of facial cues between trustworthiness and attractiveness.
Table 4.
Facial features significantly contributed to the trustworthiness judgments of Caucasian male faces by Caucasian and Chinese with attractiveness considered.