Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

The Scientific Evidence for Carcinogenic Activity taxonomy branch.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

The Mode of Action taxonomy branch.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Example keywords for the Scientific Evidence for Carcinogenic Activity taxonomy.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Example keywords for the Mode of Action taxonomy.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Classification results: number of abstracts and distinct keyword annotations for each label; number of abstracts classified as positive by the system; Precision, Recall and F-measure.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Table 1.

Profiles of the new chemicals used for annotation.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 6.

An overview of the CRAB text mining tool.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Figure 7.

Illustration of the user interface.

More »

Figure 7 Expand

Table 2.

User test results: total number of abstracts retrieved, number of abstracts classified as positive, Precision and interannotator agreement.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Journals used for the user test.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Classification results: overall Precision, Recall and F-measure with comparison to the system of Korhonen et al. [16] on the new dataset.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Mean F-score for three frequency ranges.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Figure 8.

Distribution of classified abstracts over the Scientific Evidence for Carcinogenic Activity taxonomy for two chemicals, benzo[a]pyrene and dibenzo[al]pyrene.

More »

Figure 8 Expand

Figure 9.

Genotoxic Mode of Action: distribution of classified abstracts for three chemicals: 1,3-butadiene, genistein and formaldehyde.

More »

Figure 9 Expand

Figure 10.

Non-genotoxic Mode of Action: distribution of classified abstracts for three chemicals: 1,3-butadiene, genistein and formaldehyde.

More »

Figure 10 Expand

Figure 11.

Comparison of four known genotoxic (left) and four known nongenotoxic (right) chemicals. (b–c) show the distribution in the genotoxic MOA part, (d–e) show the distribution in the nongenotoxic MOA part.

The genotoxic chemicals are 1,3-butadiene, 4-aminobiphenyl, dibenzo[a,l]pyrene and ethylene oxide; the nongenotoxic chemicals are TCDD, PCB126, PCB153 and pentachlorodibenzofuran. * indicates statistically significant differences (, Wilcoxon rank sum test).

More »

Figure 11 Expand

Figure 12.

Distribution of classified abstracts over the two main MOA classes; genotoxic and nongenotoxic, for 9 antifungal chemicals used as pesticides.

More »

Figure 12 Expand

Figure 13.

Distribution of classified triazole abstracts over some selected MOA nodes.

More »

Figure 13 Expand