Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Example of a melody in the On-Line Identification Test of Congenital Amusia.

Conditions for the melody are shown: no incongruity (A), time incongruity (B: ∥ refers to the silence of 5/7 of the beat duration), mistuned pitch incongruity (C: the circled note refers to the mistuned pitch), and out-of-key pitch incongruity (D).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Comparison of Hong Kong and Canadian Younger Participants (18–39 years old only).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Comparisons of Hong Kong and Canadian participants (younger participants only) on the Online Amusia Test.

Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. Only the Out-of-Key condition shows a significant group difference (**p<.001); note that after controlling for age, education, and musical training differences, the group difference in the Out-of-Key condition remained. The Global Score also showed a significant group difference (*p = .007).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Hong Kong and Canadian younger participants' Out-of-Key performance divided by group.

Musical training is classified into 5 levels: 1 = less than one year, 2 = 1–3 years, 3 = 4–6 years, 4 = 7–10 years, and 5 = more than 10 years.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 2.

Percentage of participants from each group who performed below three arbitrary cutoff criteria (based on Global Score).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Percentage of responses (proportion of participants) to questions relevant for the identification of amusic individuals.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Demographic information and results for participants from Experiment 2.

More »

Table 4 Expand