Table 1.
Summary of the scales considered in the analyses (hierarchical modeling) and in the measurement of the variablesa.
Table 2.
Description of the individual-level, residential neighborhood-level and supermarket-level variables analyzed, RECORD Cohort Study, Paris Metropolitan Area, 2007–2008.
Table 3.
Characteristics of the main supermarket brands and adjusted associations between supermarket brands and BMI or WC (brands are ranked by supermarket type and alphabetical order), RECORD Cohort Study, Paris Metropolitan Area, 2007–2008.
Table 4.
Associationsa between residential neighborhood education, supermarket type, distance to the supermarket, and supermarket neighborhood education and BMI or WC, RECORD Cohort Study, Paris Metropolitan Area, 2007–2008.
Figure 1.
Interactions between effects of individual education and shopping in hard discounts on the anthropometric variables.
The interactions were estimated from cross-classified multilevel linear models for body mass index (BMI) (part A) and waist circumference (WC) (part B) adjusted for individual sociodemographic characteristics, residential neighborhood education, supermarket type, distance to the supermarket, and supermarket neighborhood education (interactions assessed with a variable combining categories of the two variables). RECORD Cohort Study, Paris Metropolitan Area, 2007–2008.
Table 5.
Associationsa between supermarket type and BMI or WC before and after matching on the propensity of exposure, RECORD Cohort Study, Paris Metropolitan Area, 2007–2008.
Figure 2.
Directed acyclic graph describing the hypothesized relationships.