Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Average ratings of HIV risk and associated standard errors after rank-ordering each participant's ratings by HIV risk.

Participants' ratings of HIV risk varied across the full range of the scale (1 - low HIV risk; 7 - high HIV risk).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Factor loadings of explicit person impression ratings (PCA, x-axis represents factor 1, y-axis factor 2) from Sample 1 and Sample 2.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Relationship between HIV Risk ratings and ERPs.

(A) Representative ERP-waveforms for high and low risk stimuli over occipital (left panel) and frontal (right panel) sensor sites. The scalp potential map shows the topography of the difference between the high and low risk stimuli averaged across the time window from 220–340 ms (middle panel). (B) Representative left and right centro-frontal sensor sites illustrate the late ERP effect. The difference scalp map (high - low risk) shows the topography of the risk modulation in the LPP time window (350–700 ms).

More »

Figure 3 Expand