Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Characteristics for non-smokers and smokers (group 1).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Characteristics and lung function data for non-smokers, smokers with normal lung function and smokers with COPD (group 2).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 1.

Baseline CObreath levels measured on non-smokers, smokers with normal lung function and smokers with COPD.

A. CObreath from smokers and non-smokers recruited for a time course study of CObreath decline (group 1). CObreath (ppm) was measured in the morning; smokers having refrained from smoking during the past >8 hours. ** indicates p<0.01. B. CObreath measured on smokers with normal lung function (“smokers”), smokers with COPD and non-smokers with normal lung function (group 2). CObreath (ppm) was measured in the morning; smokers having refrained from smoking during the past 8 hours. *** indicates p<0.001.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Time course of CObreath decline after smoking one cigarette (group 1).

A. After normalisation against each individual peak value, relative CObreath values were plotted as a function of time since smoking. By non-linear regression, a one phase exponential model was fitted to the decay (Y = (Y0-0.35)*e−0.36×+0.35, r2 = 0.77). B. The natural logarithm of CObreath, ln(CObreath) was plotted versus time since smoking, and the decay was described by linear regression (Y = Y0-0.15×, r2 = 0.70). From the slope, CObreath half-life during the day was estimated to 4.5 hours (ln(2)/slope). The 95% prediction limits are also showed in the figure (dashed lines).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Proposed model for CObreath decline (group 2), and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis for evaluation of model classification performance on smoking subjects with and without COPD.

A. CObreath measurements (smokers) were recorded in the morning. After normalisation ln(CObreath) was plotted versus self-reported time since smoking. To allow comparisons with group 1, measurements performed >8 hours since smoking were omitted. CO decline was modelled by linear regression (solid line) on smokers with normal lung function. From the slope, CObreath half-life was estimated to 4.3 hours (ln(2)/slope). The 95% prediction limits are indicated in the graph as dashed lines. The upper prediction limit (Y = 3.9-0.16×) was evaluated as a cut-off. As test set, CObreath measured on smokers with COPD (n = 19) were included (indicated with triangles). B. CObreath values measured ≤7 hours were used to estimate specificity (classified as positive for recent smoking status), and values measured between 8–10 hours since smoking were used to estimate the sensitivity (classified as negative for recent smoking status). A cut-off of 12 ppm gave a sensitivity of 94% and a median specificity of 97%. Area under the curve (AUC) was 0.96. X-axis: False positive Rate, Y-axis: True positive Rate.

More »

Figure 3 Expand