Figure 1.
The magnitude of attentional capture in Experiment 1, taking into account task difficulty, through calculation of the slope ratio (subtracted the Target Singleton Slope from the Target Nonsingleton slope, and divided by the Target Nonsingleton slope), represented as a proportion on the y-axis and rank ordered by individual subjects on the x-axis.
Figure 2.
Bubble chart representing metacognitive accuracy in Experiment 1.
This depicts the number of subjects by the actual strategy employed (as revealed by the response time data) as a function of the strategy that each subject stated was used. Note that the bubble size is directly proportional to the number of subjects represented (e.g., in this chart, 21 subjects for Color x Color; 1 subject for Mixed subset x Color).
Figure 3.
Bubble chart representing the stated adherence to instructions in Experiment 2.
This depicts the number of subjects that stated a particular strategy as a function of the instructed strategy condition to which they were randomly assigned.
Figure 4.
Bubble chart representing the actual instructional adherence in Experiment 2.
This depicts the number of subjects by the actual strategy employed (as revealed by the response time data) as a function of each instructed strategy condition to which they were randomly assigned. The bubble size is directly proportional to the number of subjects represented.
Figure 5.
Bubble chart representing metacognitive accuracy in Experiment 2.
This depicts the number of subjects by the actual strategy employed (as revealed by the response time data) as a function of the strategy that each subject stated was used.