Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Distribution of ABH and Lewis Blood groups in the studied individuals.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of FUT2 genotypedeterminations with secretor phenotype determinations.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 1.

Richness and diversity of dominant bacteria in faecal samples of the non-secretor and secretor individuals (A, B) and of the Lewis a, b and negative individuals (C, D) based on the DGGE profiles.

A significant difference between the groups by ANOVA: * p<0.05. In addition, a trend (p = 0.07) towards higher diversity in the non-secretor than in secretor individuals and towards higher richness in Le b individuals than in Le negative individuals was detected.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 3.

The significantly differing band positions and the incidence of bands in secretor (14) and non-secretor samples (57) by PCR-DGGE with universal bacterial primers.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 2.

PCA plot based on the bifidobacterial DGGE profiles of faecal samples from the non-secretor (open circles) and secretor (closed circles) individuals (A) and DGGE bands contributing to the principal components 1 and 2 (B).

In panel B, the numbers in bold indicate the band positions, which were significantly less commonly (Fisher's exact test, p<0.01) detected in the non-secretor individuals than in the secretor individuals (See Table 4).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 4.

Identification of the bifidobacterial DGGE band positions by sequencing and the incidence of the bands in secretor (14) and non-secretor samples (57).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Figure 3.

Bifidobacterial richness and diversity in faecal samples of the non-secretor and secretor individuals (A, B) and Lewis a, b and negative individuals (C, D) based on the DGGE profiles.

Significant differences by ANOVA: **** p<0.0001, *** p<0.001.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Incidence (% of samples) (left) and Box-and-Whisker plots (right) (based on log10 16S rRNA gene copies per g faeces) of total bacteria, bifidobacteria and bifidobacterial groups in the faecal samples of the non-secretor and secretor individuals by qPCR.

A significant difference by Wilcoxon test: * p<0.05. In addition, a trend (p = 0.06) towards higher number of the 16S rRNA gene copies of B. adolescentis in the secretor individuals than in the non-secretor individuals was detected.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 5.

Primers used in sequencing of the FUT2 gene encoding fucosyltransferase 2.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Primers targeting the 16S rRNA gene, annealing temperature and strains used as standards in qPCR analysis.

More »

Table 6 Expand