Table 1.
Athlete groups and demographic information based on self-reports and hair analysis.
Table 2.
Self-reported use of nutritional supplements and doping in comparison to prevalence of Stanozolol/EPO use based on detection in hair in the sample by gender (presented as frequencies).
Table 3.
Groups by self-declared doping behaviour (means, SDs and test statistics for main effects).
Figure 1.
Implicit doping associations by user groups.
‘Persons’ in the middle represents 100% of the sample with persons in green representing clean athletes (n = 61); blue depicts self-reported doping (n = 11); pink shows the proportion of athletes who denied doping use (n = 10), hence would be classified as non-user according to self-reports. Panels are: (A) latency measure on the doping BIAT task by self-reported user groups; (B) D scores of the doping BIAT task by self reported user groups; (C) latency measure on the doping BIAT task based on hair analysis; (D) D scores of the doping BIAT task by self reported user groups. Circles in panels A and C represents outliers.
Table 4.
Means, SD and test statistics in the hair analysis doping behaviour scenario.
Table 5.
Interaction between measured variables (mean, minimum and maximum, respectively).
Table 6.
Doping related opinion by user groups (% is the proportion within the respective group, rounded to the closest full number).